The Fact About h4831sc That No One Is Suggesting
The Fact About h4831sc That No One Is Suggesting
Blog Article
Considering that there isn't going to look like any "official" Load Data out there for this Load, can many of you give a starting point with this combination and things to consider when working this Load up?
H4831SC Powder offered in stock now. Ballistically, this Excessive Extruded powder is the precise duplicate of H4831. Bodily, it has a shorter grain dimension, as a result, the designation SC or shorter Reduce. The shorter, far more compact kernels enable the powder to stream through the powder steps extra smoothly, helping to alleviate the continual cutting of granules.
The reality that the H4831 is indeed a slower burning powder is precisely why you're viewing higher velocities received with that powder, as opposed to Everything you've witnessed Along with the IMR stuff. Also very good powder, but rather greater suited to a bit smaller sized instances that has a bit considerably less ability.
While using the 154 grain Hornady SP from the 280, H4831 gave me superior groups and superior velocity, but Rottweil R905 has a drastically higher velocity and supplies marginally superior precision. With Swift one hundred fifty grain Sciroccos within the 7mm RM, H4831SC gave excellent accuracy and velocity, but RL22 was marginally better. Consequently, in Just about every of those cases I went with A different powder, but I would definitely detest to divest myself on the H4831.
IMR powders also preform perfectly for me with a single noteworthy exception. Every one of the chrongraphing I've finished with them signifies the velecity is consistant previously mentioned 32 degrees but begins to fluctuate when the temp starts to fall. The closer to zero I get the greater they fluctuate. I've observed approximately 250 fps in a 10 shot string with my 243 and 223 while in the winter time about right here. Haven't witnessed this with a lot of the other powders.
It really is possible that no more discussion is required, wherein situation we endorse starting up a brand new thread. If nevertheless you're feeling your response is necessary you may nevertheless achieve this.
I'm utilizing it with a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 was not as precise. RL22 did nicely but I used to be slightly concerned about temp balance. I think I am at seventy two grains and obtain all around 2850ish fps
If you have some heavier .224" bullets, you could find a load that actually works Okay Using the 4831. The bullets I attempted which were above 70 grains would not stabilize in my rifle, which experienced the typical fourteen" twist. The 70-grain Speer was the greatest bullet that could stabilize, nonetheless it did that wonderfully. It is a funny-seeking bullet having a rounded nose profile, but it really shoots good and kills nicely. Deer out to about 150 yards al went down instantly with rib-cage hits.
WA I would endorse a slower burner that may give far better scenario density like H1000 or IMR 7977, particularly when you might be loading heavies very long.
[email protected] gn and a hundred h4831sc load data and fifteen CT's, I've killed far more Deer with this combo than every one of the rifles I own mixed, Function up to this even so the sweet spot are going to be close to fifty four, I'm a Two Bit-06 nut and I have some stuff tat functions very well for me In the event your fascinated
So happy h4831 vs h4831sc your acquiring much more varieties of powder back again in. Now you should get primers back in stock and reloaded can begin reloading all over again.. just declaring
It's been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Located a node and shot some teams. I shot a .6 5 shot group currently. It is somewhat slower than H1000, but shoots fantastic. Many thanks for the advice, It truly is fantastic to are aware that I've got options when a single or the opposite powder is dried up.
However IMR 4831 and H4831SC are various powders, you can find that h4831sc load data in several instances, where by one of them is outlined another might be also. Also, you will discover there is a fairly reliable marriage in between them with regard to stated loads.
I sawed just one in 50 percent to determine how thick the jackets were, and so they were being easily twice as thick as being a 50-grain hollow place was. Ditto with the 64-grain Electrical power Position, as these bullets are constructed for deer, not prairie dogs or woodchucks. You now know every thing I understand about the 22-250 and gradual-burning powders, and I don't know anything at all in the least concerning the 223. I question that you are going to get any where with that cartridge and 4831, but allow us to understand how it goes.